Home Register Arcade Gallery Chatroom Members Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Log In
Go Back   Inside: SereneScreen Fan Forum > Prolific/LifeGlobe Products > Goldfish Aquarium 2 for Windows
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-11-2003, 09:12 PM   #1
Louis
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2001

Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 35
What's the lossless or best resolution for GA?

1a. Is 1024x768x32bits the best resolution for GA ?????
1b. What's the original texture size that has been using in GA ???


2a. What's the best angle of looking at the GA ??
2b. Why the designer of GA don't want a deeper tank ????????

When we look at the gravel on the floor, the perception will let

us know how deep is the tank. If GA team can be well use of a

visual illusion to fool the user, it's a easy way for having a deeper

tank.
Louis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2003, 08:49 AM   #2
Louis
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2001

Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 35
No one want to rely ? Ok.

1.
I knew that GA is going to release a high resolution of texture version,
but we don't know the exactly date. ( 1600x1200 ? )

2. When we see the gravel currently, it make us to feel the depth of the
tank is very short. It's very difficult to present a more deeper tank. There are some solutions like changing the size of the fishes, using fog or blur.....or using the gravel density to show how deep is the tank.

Thanks.
Louis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2003, 08:10 AM   #3
cjmaddy
Registered
 
cjmaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001

Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 7,854
I think Louis has a good point about the perception of depth.

I am surprised this post has been passed by, perhaps it is a language problem, but I find the point is clearly made!

It would not be possible in the current MA with a large central feature, nor indeed required, since the tank depth is only 12 inches. But in a future version, or in the GA, the gravel floor could be used to great advantage to give the illusion of depth! The '3-D generic question' thread is covering similar ground. (No pun intended! )

At the present time, the impression of depth given by the gravel in GA contradicts the impression given by the fish.
Why not continue the gravel, reducing progressively in size, up to nearer the half way point? - and behind the rock!

As is said in the '3-D generic question' thread, ..... it's all about creating an illusion!
cjmaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2003, 08:05 PM   #4
Louis
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2001

Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 35

At the present time, the impression of depth given by the gravel in GA contradicts the impression given by the fish.
Why not continue the gravel, reducing progressively in size, up to nearer the half way point? - and behind the rock!

Thanks for the reply.

Yes, that's what I want.
Louis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2003, 03:21 AM   #5
cjmaddy
Registered
 
cjmaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001

Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 7,854
Sorry Louis, it looks like nobody has noticed that the fish get progressively smaller, but the gravel doesn't!

If that background is 3D, - I'm a Dutchman ...... (Sorry people from Holland, - it's just a British saying! )
cjmaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Inside: SereneScreen Fan Forum > Prolific/LifeGlobe Products > Goldfish Aquarium 2 for Windows



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.