|
Re: Should it maintain backwards compatibility?
Pyros,
"A vote No is a vote for" (didn't we hear that during the election?
Seriously, a vote for No means that Jim would have to spend time adding fish to the old version, fixing bugs in it, as well as working gung ho on the new version. Supporting an older 2D background version would increase the amount of development time for each new feature to appear in the new version substantially.
"Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed. Everything else is public relations." - George Orwell
"If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal." - Emma Goldman
|