View Single Post
Old 01-20-2008, 02:22 PM   #1591
johnblommers
The Architect
 
johnblommers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004

Location: Seattle
Posts: 756
Originally posted by Jim Sachs:
Pricing is always tricky.....I picked $20 as a price because it seemed to me that it's something that most people could afford....I was hoping that someone would try different price-points so I could use them as a test-case......When the price was lowered, the volume went up a proportionate amount so that revenue was virtually unaffected. But when you increase sales by lowering prices, you have a lot more customers to deal with and need to pay more people to deal with them....  
You've described the Economics 101 (that is where I learned about it) ideal supply-demand model perfectly. So if revenues remain constant when the price is dropped then I'd recommend increasing the price to $25 since you will make more money.

Let me preface my next comment by noting that your behavior in the marketplace demonstrates one of the highest ethics I have seen. We need more such business people in the country.

But I did not feel cheated when Apple dropped the iphone price from $600 to $400, I did not feel cheated because I got no upgrade credit for Leopard, and I would not feel cheated if you charge $25 for MA3, because IMHO it is a new product, not an upgrade. Adding fish to a tank, that is an upgrade.
Reasons people don't watch Star Trek:
60% - It’s for nerds.
39% - The show’s stupid.
01% - My parents were killed by Klingons and it's still too painful.
johnblommers is offline   Reply With Quote