
Originally posted by
Tiny Turtle:
No worries, Bugsy. It wouldn't matter if Vista was twice as good and cost half - it would still be considered the definition of evil to Blommers.

Tiny Turtle, you wound me! Vista could be 10x better and cost 1/10 and I'd still define it as evil
However the chorus of posts here suggests that the Vista we have is pretty much a disappointment. Just ask a Vista user to indicate
JUST ONE compelling benefit of Vista and they will be stumped. After a minute they will parrot back some marketing talking point (no doubt "security") and then retract it hastily.
The great crime here is that Vista puts developers at risk. Develop for Vista or for XP? I hate to think that Jim Sachs wastes valuable resources developing for Vista if he could put out MA 4.0 a year sooner. Given the serious application compatibility problems with Vista, this is a big issue.
This goes way beyond johnblommers hating Microsoft. Vista is hurting people and giving computing a bad name. And that's a problem.