|
So, if the only "cons" were that it is "CPU and video card intensive" (hmmmm?.....but it seems to run just fine on my old Celeron 700 system with a TNT2 card, at about 70fps in 800 x 600).....
....then why did they give it only 3 stars?
It's a 3D screensaver! Of COURSE it's going to require at least a LITTLE bit of 3D graphics card power, and CPU power. But you have that already anyway, in order to run XP in the first place....right??
|