These three cards all come in a pci slot version, I double checked this.
I can try to find you more online prices or even some prices in Michigan for PCI video cards if you wish. It is getting very hard to get 3D-capable PCI video cards, as AGP is now 6 years old (a long time in computer terms).
The price on that TnT Riva 2 is astronomical considering it came out 3 years before the GeForce 2 MX cards.
But any preferences between these cards?
Do you think I would see any differences among them?
What is your guess as to the frame rate I would see?
Honestly, all 3 cards should generate ~50-70fps of animation at 1024x768. But the faster of the 3 cards is definately the MX400.
The nVidia Line (ranked by performance rather than chronology):
TnT Vanta
TnT Riva
TnT Riva 2
GeForce
GeForce 2 MX200
GeForce 256
GeForce 2 MX400
GeForce 2
GeForce 2 GTS
GeForce 4 MX440 (the product numbering here is screwy)
GeForce 3
GeForce 4 Ti
GeForce FX (5x00)
A TnT Riva 2 is roughly 1/4th the speed of a GeForce 2 MX400.
A GeForce 2 MX200 is a bandwidth-strangled MX400.
Here's a good benchmark... (the benchmark is much more demanding hardware-wise than the Aquarium):
http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/...charts-01.html
As for what I recommend, either of the 3 cards would be fine for your present computer. But should you buy a card today that will be obsolete if you upgrade your PC in 6-12 months? Nobody's saying you need to upgrade, only that if you are considering it, I would wait and then buy 'optimal' hardware vs. buying a 'band-aid' solution now.
NewEgg has the MX400 for $55. I guess pci cards are just more expensive.
I just looked on Pricewatch and all the MX400 PCI cards run $55. Ouch!
{EDIT: I tried to give you links to www.pricewatch.com but they have very unfriendly URLs, so search there for
GeForce 2 MX400 PCI
or
TnT Riva 2 PCI
}
There is no question that the migration from ISA to VLB to PCI to AGP for video cards has been annoying.